[Zdroyd]

Everyone knows Wikipedia is one of the best encyclopedias on the web, but it seems that for years now Conservipedia thinks its to bias. I looked over both sites and I came to this conclusion: Wikipedia is NOT bias, conservipedia is just caught in its own endless loop of blamining others, I ask you does this look unbias?

http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheist

And in every article that they talk about someone who is atheist they place "atheist" in front of their name...

So here is what you should use:

Wikipedia; if you want truth and no lies.
Conservipeida; if you want to laugh at their own ignorance.
Uncyclopedia; if you want to have fun.

The above quote was something I wrote for an debate we had in class today; I would like everyones responses.

Also everyone check out Uncyclopedia Every page will make you laugh!

Searches I found funny:
God
Atheism
High School
Russian Reversal
WWIII (This is funny, they have the war all planed out!)

[Zangetsu]

wikipedia is one Encyclopedia and its the best one ^_^

[Smith6612]

I've heard of Uncyclopedia. Isn't that kind of the place where 4chan ripped their stuff off of or am I thinking of the reverse? Otherwise, I use Wikipedia and Reference.com for my online dictionaries. Mainly I use Wikipedia, but if it's not there then I use Reference. If it's still not there, then I use MSN/Live Encarta.

[Dazz]

Gotta say having looked at Conservipedia and wow bias as anything. I've always used wikipedia myself and its never let me down yet ;-)

[Zdroyd]

Originally Posted by Smith6612

I've heard of Uncyclopedia. Isn't that kind of the place where 4chan ripped their stuff off of or am I thinking of the reverse? Otherwise, I use Wikipedia and Reference.com for my online dictionaries. Mainly I use Wikipedia, but if it's not there then I use Reference. If it's still not there, then I use MSN/Live Encarta.

I believe 4Chan ripped of Wikipedia... Uncyclopedia is just a site for fun and laughs.