|
|
|
View Poll Results: ATI or Nvdia?
|
|
ATI
|
  
|
9 |
36.00% |
|
Nvidia
|
  
|
16 |
64.00% |
 |
|
x10Hosting Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 53
Credits:
1,129
Location: California
|
|
08-25-2008, 12:52 AM
|
|
Nvidia or ATI
The old question, Seems like it hasent been asked here in the last few weeks. Gamers, And professional work users, Whats best?
Nvdia or ATI?
Which has better value?
Which has less issues?
Which is more popular?
|
|
|
|
x10 Spammer
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,664
Credits:
3,179
|
|
08-25-2008, 02:12 AM
|
|
Re: Nvidia or ATI
I'm an nVidia person. Yes, ATi has been performing nicely against the GeForce cards, I just stick with nVidia. I've found their cards to handle more load on them, despite them having more of a tendency to like to overheat if your cooling system blows.
Otherwise, I find the nVidia cards to be more common amonst hard core gamers, and ATi for the people who want to have the same performance or close to the GeForce cards, but want to save some money. Also, now that the GeForce 8, 9, and 200 series cards now have CUDA abilities and now have PhysX processing abilities thanks to a new driver, that makes GeForce cards even better.
__________________
THE SENTRY'S A SPY!
|
|
|
|
x10Hosting Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 57
Credits:
466
Location: Victoria, Australia
|
|
08-25-2008, 05:37 AM
|
|
Re: Nvidia or ATI
ati cards are currently cheaper and faster
not sure why smith says nvidia is more reliable there is currently a class action lawsuit against nvidia due to their mobile chips being unreliable
|
|
|
|
x10Hosting Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23
Credits:
401
|
|
08-25-2008, 11:37 AM
|
|
Re: Nvidia or ATI
I've always had good luck with nVidia products. With the unified driver system in place I haven't had much trouble upgrading to a new card. It's truly plug-n-play for me.
The only problem I had was moving from an old PCI card to an AGP. A few hours of searching the net later I found I just had to delete and reinstall a few drivers (MCP Bridge I think?) and it worked like a charm.
I haven't used any ATI products myself but have helped friends install their cards. It's always been a bit of a hassle. Honestly, though, I didn't notice much of a difference between our two machines running nearly the same ram/fsb/chipset. Only major difference was the graphics card. The benchmark programs always reported a very similar score varying just a few points.
|
|
|
|
x10 Spammer
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,664
Credits:
3,179
|
|
08-25-2008, 01:04 PM
|
|
Re: Nvidia or ATI
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBH187
ati cards are currently cheaper and faster
not sure why smith says nvidia is more reliable there is currently a class action lawsuit against nvidia due to their mobile chips being unreliable
|
The mobile chips are not reliable because of the heating issue. GeForce cards produce a lot of heat and most laptops have no way or dissipating all of that heat, let alone with the CPU, RAM and HDD producing heat as well. nVidia can't do a thing other than make their mobile cards run slower. Laptop makers need to work on their cooling systems for laptops better.
__________________
THE SENTRY'S A SPY!
|
|
|
|
x10 Lieutenant
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 429
Credits:
3,333
Location: BIG APPLE
|
|
08-25-2008, 08:51 PM
|
|
Re: Nvidia or ATI
Up to the Geforce 8-series, Nvidia has been a clear winner. But with the release of the Radeon 4850 and 4870, ATI has taken the lead for value. Heat issues can be overcome with a simple fan-control program or patch, and they are only slightly more unstable than Nvidia cards atm because drivers haven't matured yet. Nvidia cards are still more popular though. And CUDA-based GPU PhysX isn't really a plus on the Nvidia side since it has already been ported to ATI cards as well using modified drivers. Nvidia still holds the top performance spot, but their cards are highly overpriced in comparison, and the few cards below their top-tier GTX 280 are disappointing in performance, actually falling behind ATI's cards.
|
|
|
|
Retired
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,326
Credits:
2,532
|
|
08-26-2008, 08:45 PM
|
|
Re: Nvidia or ATI
I'm an nVidia fan, but the Radeon 4850/4870 are giving nVidia a run for its money
|
|
|
|
I love the internet
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,693
Credits:
8,595
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
|
|
08-27-2008, 05:18 AM
|
|
Re: Nvidia or ATI
nVidia since all offewrs from it (first 10 levels of portal, half-life 2 deathmatch, half-life lost coast for free). Then you need it for FPS creator x10. + they sponsor ESWC
|
|
|
|
x10 Lieutenant
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 275
Credits:
3,395
|
|
08-29-2008, 08:09 AM
|
|
Re: Nvidia or ATI
NVidia if you play a lot of games (or do pro graphics work) that needs very good graphics, but ATI if your building a cheaper computer that doesnt need the very best graphics (eg. for occasional gaming).
Alex
|
|
|
|
x10 Lieutenant
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 429
Credits:
3,333
Location: BIG APPLE
|
|
08-29-2008, 12:24 PM
|
|
Re: Nvidia or ATI
Quote:
Originally Posted by componentwarehouse
NVidia if you play a lot of games (or do pro graphics work) that needs very good graphics, but ATI if your building a cheaper computer that doesnt need the very best graphics (eg. for occasional gaming).
Alex
|
I'm sorry, but I don't follow your argument. ATI cards are known for superior image quality compared to Nvidia, so if you wanted 'better' graphics, you'd go with ATI. And now that ATI has released the 4870X2, ATI has better performance as well (although it is quite a bit more expensive).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
Facebook Proxy | Loans | Naruto | Private Student Loans | Car Insurance
| |