x10Hosting Forums

Corporate Free Hosting for the Masses.


x10Hosting wishes you a great Year!

Register

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
x10Hosting Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9
Credits: 290
ivica178 is on a distinguished road
Quote  
10-10-2008, 12:18 PM
NTFS vs FAT

Why is NTFS faster than FAT, or isn't?
Reply With Quote
ivica178 is offlineReport Post
x10 Sophmore

neverlate2day's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Credits: 2,027
neverlate2day is on a distinguished road
Location: India

Quote  
10-10-2008, 02:12 PM
Re: NTFS vs FAT

did u try googling before posting
Reply With Quote
neverlate2day is offlineReport Post
x10Hosting Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Credits: 303
monaco is on a distinguished road
Quote  
10-10-2008, 02:41 PM
Re: NTFS vs FAT

To know these please go to http://www.wikipedia.org/, type NTFS then FAT. You will know more...
Reply With Quote
monaco is offlineReport Post
x10 Elder

alexandgruntz's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 550
Credits: 6,461
alexandgruntz is on a distinguished road
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Send a message via MSN to alexandgruntz Send a message via Yahoo to alexandgruntz
Quote  
10-10-2008, 04:14 PM
Re: NTFS vs FAT

NTFS is more efficient than FAT(32), as NTFS's cluster sizes are smaller, resulting in less wasted space. It also supports compression and encryption. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS.
__________________
Real people use Firefox to browse the net.



Reply With Quote
alexandgruntz is offlineReport Post
x10 Spammer

Smith6612's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,851
Credits: 4,243
Smith6612 is just really nice
Quote  
10-10-2008, 04:20 PM
Re: NTFS vs FAT

FAT is suppored by basically any operating system and is the least trouble free when it comes down to Linux and such. However NTFS is very flexible and a well done File System. Yeah it may be a pain in the butt to get working in Linux in some cases, but it's certainly much more efficient. Think of NTFS as Windows NT Kernel and FAT32 as DOS (which is actually what each File System is built for I believe). DOS is a bit more unstable than the NT Kernel.
__________________


VEHICULAR SAYS HAPPY NEAR YEAR!!!
Reply With Quote
Smith6612 is offlineReport Post
VIP User

Livewire's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,136
Credits: 6,129
Livewire has a spectacular aura about
Location: Artic

Send a message via Yahoo to Livewire
Quote  
10-10-2008, 05:39 PM
Re: NTFS vs FAT

I'm surprised no one's mentioned that FAT cannot handle a single file larger than 4gb.

Granted theres very few LEGAL reasons to want a filesize larger than that, but there are some (DVD backups, game disc backups, etc).

So if you're trying to make a backup of your Crysis DVD, or of your favorite movie, you're dead in the water on FAT (assuming you're backing it up into an iso or other non-compressed format), whereas NTFS will simply say yes if theres enough space left.
Reply With Quote
Livewire is online nowReport Post
Moderator

vol7ron's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 287
Credits: 2,158
vol7ron will become famous soon enough
Location: DC

Quote  
10-14-2008, 01:06 AM
Re: NTFS vs FAT

FAT16 = Ancient
FAT32 = Legacy
NTFS = New compression/encryption and smaller clusters


NTFS is not backwards migratable, but FAT32 is forward migratable. I think I got that right. That is, if you installed your OS to FAT32, you can make it NTFS without losing any data. However, once you're NTFS, you cannot go back to FAT32, without reformatting and reinstalling your OS.

I heard from a Microsoft rep that NTFS is soon to be replaced as well.
__________________
If you find my post useful please add to my reputation by clicking the +Rep button
You may also use the Donate link to donate credits - this is appreciated too Thanks to those whom have donated so far!

Reply With Quote
vol7ron is offlineReport Post
x10Hosting Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 9
Credits: 165
nirajkum is on a distinguished road
Quote  
10-15-2008, 01:10 AM
Re: NTFS vs FAT

FAT is like windows 98 very basic but very user frndly. NTFS is more sofisticated . The data is stored in NTFS is well organised as compared to FAT so it is fast .FAT cant handle file with more than 4GB.

To support NTFS on Linux yoc ana refer http://www.linux-ntfs.org/doku.php
Reply With Quote
nirajkum is offlineReport Post
x10 Elder

Sharky's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 751
Credits: 510
Sharky will become famous soon enough
Location: In a house, a very big house, in the country...

Quote  
10-15-2008, 04:23 AM
Re: NTFS vs FAT

Quote:
Originally Posted by vol7ron View Post
NTFS is not backwards migratable, but FAT32 is forward migratable. I think I got that right. That is, if you installed your OS to FAT32, you can make it NTFS without losing any data. However, once you're NTFS, you cannot go back to FAT32, without reformatting and reinstalling your OS.
Not quite true... PartitionMagic should be able to do this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PartitionMagic
__________________
Regards,
Sharky, B.A. (Hons)
Reply With Quote
Sharky is offlineReport Post
x10 Elder

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 561
Credits: 6,143
Nathan H will become famous soon enough
Quote  
10-15-2008, 09:05 AM
Re: NTFS vs FAT

This is true, Partition magic does allow the transition between ANY file systems with no loss of data.
__________________
Nathan H Formerly UnFoundBug



http://www.theadmin.co.uk - Yes i know the colours don't go, I'm working on it.

VPS Admin | x10-commandments

So thats where it went! I thought i was losing my mind.
Reply With Quote
Nathan H is offlineReport Post
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ubuntu 8.04 and KDE4! Sup3rkirby Computers & Technology 10 04-12-2008 11:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios