|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
x10Hosting Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9
Credits:
290
|
|
10-10-2008, 12:18 PM
|
|
NTFS vs FAT
Why is NTFS faster than FAT, or isn't?
|
|
|
|
x10 Sophmore
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Credits:
2,027
Location: India
|
|
10-10-2008, 02:12 PM
|
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
did u try googling before posting
|
|
|
|
x10Hosting Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Credits:
303
|
|
10-10-2008, 02:41 PM
|
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
To know these please go to http://www.wikipedia.org/, type NTFS then FAT. You will know more...
|
|
|
|
x10 Elder
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 550
Credits:
6,461
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
|
|
10-10-2008, 04:14 PM
|
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
NTFS is more efficient than FAT(32), as NTFS's cluster sizes are smaller, resulting in less wasted space. It also supports compression and encryption. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS.
__________________
Real people use Firefox to browse the net.
|
|
|
|
x10 Spammer
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,851
Credits:
4,243
|
|
10-10-2008, 04:20 PM
|
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
FAT is suppored by basically any operating system and is the least trouble free when it comes down to Linux and such. However NTFS is very flexible and a well done File System. Yeah it may be a pain in the butt to get working in Linux in some cases, but it's certainly much more efficient. Think of NTFS as Windows NT Kernel and FAT32 as DOS (which is actually what each File System is built for I believe). DOS is a bit more unstable than the NT Kernel.
__________________
VEHICULAR SAYS HAPPY NEAR YEAR!!!
|
|
|
|
VIP User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,136
Credits:
6,129
Location: Artic
|
|
10-10-2008, 05:39 PM
|
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
I'm surprised no one's mentioned that FAT cannot handle a single file larger than 4gb.
Granted theres very few LEGAL reasons to want a filesize larger than that, but there are some (DVD backups, game disc backups, etc).
So if you're trying to make a backup of your Crysis DVD, or of your favorite movie, you're dead in the water on FAT (assuming you're backing it up into an iso or other non-compressed format), whereas NTFS will simply say yes if theres enough space left.
__________________

|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 287
Credits:
2,158
Location: DC
|
|
10-14-2008, 01:06 AM
|
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
FAT16 = Ancient
FAT32 = Legacy
NTFS = New compression/encryption and smaller clusters
NTFS is not backwards migratable, but FAT32 is forward migratable. I think I got that right. That is, if you installed your OS to FAT32, you can make it NTFS without losing any data. However, once you're NTFS, you cannot go back to FAT32, without reformatting and reinstalling your OS.
I heard from a Microsoft rep that NTFS is soon to be replaced as well.
__________________
If you find my post useful please add to my reputation by clicking the +Rep button
You may also use the Donate link to donate credits - this is appreciated too Thanks to those whom have donated so far!
|
|
|
|
x10Hosting Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 9
Credits:
165
|
|
10-15-2008, 01:10 AM
|
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
FAT is like windows 98 very basic but very user frndly. NTFS is more sofisticated . The data is stored in NTFS is well organised as compared to FAT so it is fast .FAT cant handle file with more than 4GB.
To support NTFS on Linux yoc ana refer http://www.linux-ntfs.org/doku.php
|
|
|
|
x10 Elder
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 751
Credits:
510
Location: In a house, a very big house, in the country...
|
|
10-15-2008, 04:23 AM
|
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
Quote:
Originally Posted by vol7ron
NTFS is not backwards migratable, but FAT32 is forward migratable. I think I got that right. That is, if you installed your OS to FAT32, you can make it NTFS without losing any data. However, once you're NTFS, you cannot go back to FAT32, without reformatting and reinstalling your OS.
|
Not quite true... PartitionMagic should be able to do this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PartitionMagic
__________________
Regards,
Sharky, B.A. (Hons)
|
|
|
|
x10 Elder
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 561
Credits:
6,143
|
|
10-15-2008, 09:05 AM
|
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
This is true, Partition magic does allow the transition between ANY file systems with no loss of data.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Ubuntu 8.04 and KDE4!
|
Sup3rkirby |
Computers & Technology |
10 |
04-12-2008 11:21 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
| |