Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartan Erik
There aren't enough applications out there that even utilize two cores properly, let alone four..
Software vendors are going to be playing catch-up for awhile at this rate..
|
You're right, software vendors are not utilizing 2 cores properly, but all that means is that the CPU is under performing it's potential. The performance gain is still there, it's just not being used to its potential. 4 Cores will be the same deal, the benefits are still better than the dual core, but they won't be used to their full potential. This can be said with almost any processor, though. There's theoretical and actual performance - in both cases quad cores are better.
The real trick is to get the OS on the same page, rather than just the programs.
You should view the results of Nehalem, though. Quad-Core with HyperThreading (8 Threads), also expected to be released by the end of the year, hence the drop in Core2 Quads.
The preliminary tests already show an improvement gain. Not to mention Intel is finally going towards an Integrated Memory Controller - that's an on-die memory controller - the same process AMDs been doing for years. These gains are with demo chips that don't even have the proper motherboards/PCI-e drivers equipped to handle the processors yet. When they are finally built, the world is in for a world of computing-power.